Judges and lawmakers across the country are wrangling over whether and when law enforcement authorities can peer into suspects? cellphones and the cornucopia of evidence they provide, Somini Sengupta reports in Monday?s New York Times.
A Rhode Island judge threw out cellphone evidence that led to a man being charged with the murder of a 6-year-old boy, saying the police needed a search warrant. A court in Washington compared text messages to voice mail messages that can be overheard by anyone in a room and are therefore not protected by state privacy laws.
In Louisiana, a federal appeals court is weighing whether location records stored in smartphones deserve privacy protection, or whether they are ?business records? that belong to the phone companies.
?The courts are all over the place,? said Hanni Fakhoury, a criminal lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based civil liberties group. ?They can?t even agree if there?s a reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages that would trigger Fourth Amendment protection.?
The issue will attract attention on Thursday when a Senate committee considers limited changes to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, a 1986 law that regulates how the government can monitor digital communications. Courts have used it to permit warrantless surveillance of certain kinds of cellphone data.
A proposed amendment would require the police to obtain a warrant to search e-mail, no matter how old it was, updating a provision that currently allows warrantless searches of e-mails more than 180 days old.
As technology races ahead of the law, courts and lawmakers are still trying to figure out how to think about the often intimate data that cellphones contain, said Peter P. Swire, a law professor at Ohio State University. Neither the 1986 statute nor the Constitution, he said, could have anticipated how much information cellphones may contain, including detailed records of people?s travels and diagrams of their friends.
?It didn?t take into account what the modern cellphone has ? your location, the content of communications that are easily readable, including Facebook posts, chats, texts and all that stuff,? Mr. Swire said.
Source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/26/daily-report-law-enforcement-vs-cellphone-privacy/
cj wilson ellsbury brad pitt and angelina jolie brad and angelina herniated disc sacramento kings luke scott
No comments:
Post a Comment